幸福来敲门
河北多部门发布预警预报 8月25日夜间到28日中部地区将出现强降雨_我的网站
A |
China saw robust exports in electric vehicles (EV), lithium batteries and photovoltaic products, known as the "new three," in the first half of this year. More notably, robotics, artificial intelligence (AI) and innovative drugs, which represent the future direction of industrial development, are also emerging as new calling cards for China's foreign trade.
However, the impressive performance provoked unease among some Western media outlets and politicians. Some have deliberately portrayed China's rapid industrial development and strong competitiveness as a result of government subsidies, pushing the false claim that subsidies have created overcapacity and those low-priced Chinese products are flooding global markets. Such fallacies, which simply equate industrial subsidies with overcapacity, are not only logically flawed but also factually groundless.
In practice, many countries adopt industrial policies tailored to their national conditions and development needs, such as providing research and development (R&D) subsidies for emerging industries and risk related subsidies for agriculture.
Well-designed industrial subsidies can help address market failures, promote technological innovation and environmental protection, reduce poverty and support balanced development, rather than cause so called "overcapacity."
Multiple reports by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development have noted that the number of industrial policies worldwide has grown rapidly over the past five years, with R&D subsidies, tax incentives and low interest loans for emerging industries becoming common international practices.
Forcibly linking industrial subsidies to "overcapacity" is, in essence, a political manipulation based on double standards. The US, for example, plans to provide $750 billion in various subsidies from 2022 to 2031 under its Inflation Reduction Act. Subsidized EVs are subject to requirements such as production and sales in the US or North America, effectively excluding other WTO members. US industrial subsidies for AI are even greater than those of all other countries combined.
Similarly, according to incomplete statistics, the European Commission is expected to provide more than 1.44 trillion euros ($210 billion) in various subsidies between 2021 and 2030. The EU's Industrial Accelerator Act links local content directly to financial support through "Made in EU" requirements, creating serious investment barriers and institutional discrimination.
Have these massive subsidies been labeled as causing "overcapacity"? The answer is no. While claiming that China's industrial subsidies lead to so-called overcapacity, these countries are themselves providing massive subsidies to their own industries. Such double standards amount to selective accusations targeting China, aimed at politicizing trade and economic issues and weaponizing industrial policy.
At a deeper level, accusations that "China's industrial subsidies cause overcapacity" are merely a pretext, reflecting growing anxiety and fear over the rising competitiveness of Chinese industries.
Looking back at the repeated hype in Western media, the criticism has consistently targeted China's most globally competitive industries, including new-energy vehicles, photovoltaics and power batteries. This exposes the real intention of shifting the blame for their own lagging industrial development onto China while stepping up restrictions against Chinese industries.
China's breakthroughs in these industries have been driven by advances in homegrown technologies, complete industrial and supply chains, and robust market competition, rather than by policy subsidies as some have claimed.
In recent years, China has taken multiple steps to regulate and improve its subsidy policies, from reviewing and correcting inappropriate local subsidies to exploring a unified negative list mechanism for local fiscal subsidies. China applies subsidies equally to all market entities, including foreign invested enterprises, strictly follows WTO rules, and continues to improve the compliance, effectiveness and transparency of its subsidy policies.
Rather than fabricating and hyping baseless claims about subsidies and obsessing over building trade barriers, certain Western media outlets and politicians should focus on addressing their own weaknesses and increasing investment in research and development. They should embrace healthy market competition with an inclusive mindset, promote mutual benefit through greater openness, and win markets and drive progress through genuine innovation.
This was compiled and translated by the Global Times English edition based on an article published in the "Chisu Jinsheng" economic commentary column of the People's Daily on August 10, 2026.
。
B | 日报讯（记者宋平、苑立立、郝东伟）省气象台预计，8月25日夜间到28日，我省有全省性降水过程，中部地区将出现强降雨天气。8月25日9时11分，省气象台发布暴雨橙色预警信号，预计25日下午到26日上午，张家口南部、唐山南部、保定、雄安新区、廊坊、石家庄、沧州、衡水等地有暴雨到大暴雨，局地降雨量可能超过200毫米；降雨对流明显，部分地区1小时雨量可达70毫米以上或6小时雨量可达100毫米以上。山区及浅山区有出现山洪、泥石流、滑坡等次生灾害的风险，低洼地区有积水风险。为此，8月25日10时，省气象灾害防御指挥部启动重大气象灾害（暴雨）Ⅲ级应急响应，要求相关部门密切关注此次暴雨天气过程，加强风险研判和安全隐患排查，适时启动相应级别应急响应，做好防范应对工作。省自然资源厅与省气象局联合发布地质灾害气象风险预警8月25日10时30分，省自然资源厅与省气象局联合发布地质灾害气象风险预警。
C | 预警提示，8月25日14时至26日14时，保定市（涞水县、阜平县、涞源县）、张家口市（蔚县、怀来县、涿鹿县）、石家庄市（井陉矿区、井陉县、行唐县、灵寿县、平山县）发生崩塌、滑坡、泥石流等地质灾害风险较高（黄色预警）。上述地区各级政府及有关部门要按照应急预案做好地质灾害防御工作。
D | 社会公众要及时关注地质灾害气象风险预警信息，谨慎前往地质灾害预警区域。黄色预警区内人员要随时关注预警信息变化，注意附近警示标志，避免在沟谷、斜坡、陡崖（坎）等高风险地带逗留。省水利厅和省气象局联合发布山洪灾害气象风险预警8月25日17时，省水利厅和省气象局联合发布山洪灾害气象风险预警。预警提示，8月25日20时至26日20时，保定市（涞水县、涞源县、曲阳县、阜平县）、张家口市（宣化区、涿鹿县、蔚县、阳原县）、石家庄市（井陉县、井陉矿区、元氏县、平山县、灵寿县、行唐县、赞皇县、鹿泉区）等地局地可能发生山洪灾害（蓝色预警）。其他地区也可能因局地短历时强降水引发山洪灾害。各地要密切关注降雨情况，强化山洪灾害监测，及时发布预警信息，提前组织群众转移避险，确保人民群众生命安全。
E | 省防汛抗旱指挥部启动防汛四级应急响应经会商研判，省防汛抗旱指挥部决定于8月25日10时对石家庄市、张家口市、唐山市、廊坊市、保定市、沧州市、衡水市、雄安新区、定州市、辛集市启动防汛四级应急响应。目前，我省仍处于汛期和群众旅游出行高峰期。省防指要求各地各部门克服麻痹思想和侥幸心理，督促各级防汛责任人在岗在位，密切关注天气形势，加强会商研判，落实临灾预警“叫应”机制，紧盯山洪沟口、狭窄河道等高风险区域和养老机构、施工工地等重点部位，强化旅游景区、民宿、野游路线和企业防汛安全管理，做好人员转移避险工作。加强城乡低洼区域、下沉道桥、漫水路等重点部位巡查管控力度，提前落实排涝措施，确保人民群众生命财产安全。
Current article:http://9p7.chuandanfozhuanbenglipaicuzi.pics/87jc/5kxjc8.html
Published on:20:59:22
雍正王朝
说出你的故事