
A | 创天互娱联合银河聚阵今日公布,获Netmarble(网石)正版授权,经典端游IP《石器时代》正版复刻新作,《石器时代》将于8月28日14:00开启第二轮重聚测试。 "I believe the New York Times report is correct in every detail," says Philip Giraldi, a former CIA station chief and military intelligence officer. "It is what I have been hearing. There is considerable training at the Grafenwoehr, Germany army base to familiarize the Ukrainians with the new weapons arriving. Meanwhile there are cadres of special operations soldiers and intelligence personnel operating primarily in western Ukraine. They are not in uniform and many of them are working under various cover designations, including sometimes loose affiliations with foreign embassies and NGOs. All of which means that Biden and other Western leaders are lying about their active participation in the conflict.",Ahead of the Russian special operation to demilitarize and de-Nazify Ukraine, the US withdrew its own 150 military instructors. However, some CIA operatives continued their service in the country secretly, directing most of the intelligence flow the US is sharing with Ukrainian forces, according to the NYT. In addition to that, commandos from Washington's NATO allies have been managing the flow of weapons and equipment in Ukraine and providing training. The NYT specifies, citing American and other Western officials that the commandos are not on the front lines with Ukrainian troops.,Even though the US and NATO member states do not acknowledge that their personnel are operating in Ukraine, Russia and other intelligence services around the world are aware of this, according to the newspaper.,"The potential downside for the president comes when some of these soldiers in mufti get killed or, worse, captured and start to talk about their role," says Giraldi. "The Biden Administration has staked its reputation and possible political future on enabling Ukraine to survive without succumbing to Russian demands.",Deploying CIA personnel (which encompasses military as well as intelligence operatives) "is completely typical of the initial stages of a US-backed long war, and for long-term political manipulation of the target country," according to retired US Air Force Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, a former analyst for the US Department of Defense.,"This is the future that neoconservative 'strategists' in DC and their British and European allies imagine for Ukraine," Kwiatkowski highlights. "Rather than a negotiated conclusion, with a new Ukrainian role as a neutral and productive country, independent of both Russian and US political influences, the US government and CIA see Ukraine as an expendable yet useful satrap in its competition with the Russian Federation.",The ex-DoD analyst emphasizes that the effort is serious, given that the funding for CIA operations and arms sales and support and training has been flowing freely from Congress and President Biden. It also means that the intel operations in and around Ukraine are "of critical importance" to Washington, according to her.,Situation in UkraineNATO is De Facto at War With Russia but is Using Ukraine as a Tool, US Scholar Says5 April, 17:37 GMT,Ukraine is Washington's Proxy in Effort to Destroy Russia,"Ukraine was being used long before 2021 and 2022, as a US proxy, for global money laundering by multiple players, and for CIA political operations," explains Kwiatkowski. "The US diplomats and the CIA view Ukraine and its various people as pawns on a chessboard they can manage. Given that the US people are not willing to engage in a ground or air war with Russia over Ukraine, those pawns might need to be preserved for the next stage.",Washington's current interest in Ukraine dates back to at least the George W. Bush era, and probably much earlier, with the US foreign policy establishment making steady efforts to drive a wedge between Russia and its neighbor, according to the military veteran. Washington has made considerable financial, diplomatic and political investment in Ukraine over the recent decades and it cannot afford "losing" it.,"Coming on the heels of similar 'losses' in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and potentially some of the Gulf states, there are those in Washington who would find the complete loss of Ukraine unacceptable," she stresses.,The US is equally involved in former Soviet and Warsaw Pact countries, such as Lithuania, and Poland, to take the post-Soviet space under control "as part of the war to maintain US influence and contain Russian influence," according to the former Pentagon analyst. "Recent Lithuanian steps to enforce EU sanctions on the Russian Baltic Sea trade port and naval city of Kaliningrad speaks to the nature of what is to come, in the eyes of the US strategists," she points out.,"Ukraine is a proxy; the West is trying to destroy Russia, it's that simple," echoes Larry Johnson, a veteran of the CIA and the State Department’s Office of Counter Terrorism, which provided training to the US Military’s Special Operations taskforce for 24 years. "It would be one thing if Russia was the most evil, oppressive, authoritarian regime in the world. It's nowhere even close. Even though the West keeps trying to portray Russia as such. The fact of the matter is, the West wants the resources that Russia has and it wants to control Russia. Russia is not about to be controlled.",Situation in UkraineEx-CIA Analyst: US Military Aid Not a Game Changer for Kiev, Ukraine Has Already Lost6 June, 16:31 GMT,US Trying to Find the Way Out of Ukraine's Mess,Despite CIA and NATO personnel being deployed in Ukraine and NATO weapons constantly flowing to the country, Ukrainian troops have been increasingly outgunned by DPR/LPR military groups backed by Russia, acknowledges the NYT.,The newspaper names a number of reasons behind the Ukrainian Armed Forces' failures, including limited time for training to use sophisticated NATO weapons; huge losses among the "most battle-hardened" and well-trained Ukrainian forces; and certain limits to the expertise of the CIA, which is traditionally focused on counter-intelligence, among other matters.,"This is the fault of Hollywood," says Johnson. "There's always the assumption that all these CIA personnel are really some terrific people. They've got magical training capabilities. They don't. The CIA hasn't won a single insurgent war in the last 40 years, except going back to supporting the mujahedeen against the Soviets in Afghanistan. They're hoping to try to recreate that miracle. But again, the problem is the people who are assigned militarily to this kind of CIA activity are either retired, special forces, special operations personnel who had to get out because they were either physically unable to perform according to military standards, or it's people who've always wanted to do that kind of thing but really have had no special training in it.",Situation in UkraineUS Military Expert: Russia to Score Major Victories in Donbass, Must Adapt to New NATO Game22 May, 17:55 GMT,The former CIA analyst raises the question about the timing of the NYT exposure. He notes that it has never been a secret that in every foreign conflict the US was interested in, the US has routinely provided training and assistance, and dispatched the CIA's Special Activities Division to operate on the ground. Why is NYT openly writing about it now?,"I think the answer lies in the very last paragraph, last sentence of the article, where it is said: 'Would the enhancement of training be worth the possible price that is going to have to be paid?' The answer is 'probably not.' In other words, this is a gesture to show 'yeah, look, we're doing everything we can do to help the Ukrainians, we've provided we've provided special forces, special operations forces, we've brought them into other countries, we're sending our own people there, the CIA and their passive intelligence, so they can target Russian positions.' But when all is said and done, doing more is not going to really help.",According to Johnson, the NYT piece is "really sending a signal that the United States is trying to figure out how to disengage from this mess.","I think the purpose of this article coming out now is just to lay the groundwork for why we can't put or shouldn't put any more US military personnel or even CIA personnel inside Ukraine," the CIA veteran emphasizes. "Because continuing to put US personnel, whether they're CIA or military, inside Ukraine to train, is becoming too risky because of Russia's success on the battlefield."。 测试阶段充值公测阶梯返利最高 1.2 倍,参与官网活动还有机会拿到 CDK 礼包、石器主题冰箱贴等限量实体周边。

B | 游戏从角色、玩法、宠物、任务、剧情等多方面1:1精准还原经典原作同时,更保留了原作成长计算、组队PK等核心玩法。《石器时代》付费删档第二轮重聚测试现已开放资格招募,玩家可前往官网进行报名。
1. 延续经典美术风格,画质全面优化初代石器标志性的复古美术调性完整保留,经典画风未作改动。同时在一测基础上完成视觉升级,优化色彩饱和度、场景光影层次及模型质感,整体画面更干净通透、细腻柔和。无论挂机刷怪、野外探索、洞窟团战还是宠物养成,视觉观感均有明显提升。熟悉的画面风格得以延续,现代视觉表现也更为流畅,长期游玩不易产生视觉疲劳。

C |
2. 原版经典角色集结,形象100%复刻初代全部原始人角色完整回归,角色外观严格参照端游原作设计,进入游戏即可见到记忆里标志性的人物样貌。

D | 回归玩家可直接辨认角色身份,无需重新适应陌生建模;新玩家接触的也是系列正统人物设定,不会被二次魔改内容干扰认知,上手理解成本更低。
3. 全谱系宠物集结,打造专属编年图鉴旧版宠物种类有限,选择空间较小。重聚测试版本收录历代全系列经典宠物,收集范围大幅拓宽。宠物成长计算器完整保留,每只宠物的属性与成长机制沿用原版设定,数值未作改动。

E | 玩家可自由筛选高成长个体,按自身思路搭配阵容。无论是休闲收集图鉴,还是冲榜、PK深度养成,均能体验正统石器宠物培养的玩法内容。

4. 经典任务完整复刻,优化游玩节奏原版主线、支线、转生等经典任务完整保留,熟悉的剧情流程与关键节点均未改动。

F | 重聚测试版本对跑图频繁、流程拖沓等问题做了针对性调整,减少了反复往返的无效环节。

G | 任务内容本身不变,但整体推进节奏更为紧凑。老玩家重温剧情时不需再为重复跑图耗费精力,新玩家推进主线时也能获得更顺畅的流程体验。
5. 装备道具全面迭代,降低养成门槛原版版全套武器、防具、消耗道具均按1:1比例还原,外观、属性及适配逻辑延续原作设定,老玩家上手即熟悉,无需重新适应新体系。重聚测试版本新增多款便民道具,优化跑图、挂机练级等高频场景体验;装备合成配方已重构,高阶极品装备的获取门槛有所降低。普通玩家及零氪群体无需高强度爆肝即可获取优质装备,养成压力减轻,游玩获得感提升。

H | 
6. 继承经典玩法,坚守石器初心初代自由抓捕、属性相克、回合对战、刷级、副本、PK等核心玩法完整保留,体系偏重阵容搭配、战术博弈与团队协作。胜负更多取决于玩家对宠物的理解、阵容思路以及组队配合,而非单纯的数值碾压。

I | 玩家可邀约老友开荒探险,也可在竞技场展开对抗。对于怀旧老玩家与回合策略爱好者而言,均能从中获得具备策略深度且相对公平的竞技体验。

除上述核心内容升级外,重聚测试版本还新增了休闲系统与限时活动等内容,全部实机内容将于8月28日完整解锁。距离首轮测试已过去半年,研发团队根据多轮玩家反馈持续进行调整与优化。官网预约通道现已开放,玩家可前往官方网站直接预约测试资格,官方玩家群也已同步开启,玩家可入群与其他原始人共同交流组队。

J | 8月28日,尼斯大陆见。
Current article:http://9p7.chuandanfozhuanbenglipaicuzi.pics/news/20260826_869.html
Published on:12:53:55